What is the relationship used between these two tables? I would have thought that it matches by Claim ID but Transaction #1 does not show any value for this field...
It looks like you have set up a sub summar part with Claim ID as the "sorted by" field and since Tran #1 lacks a value in this field, it is not grouped with the others that do have this common value. Either the first transaction record needs this same value or you should be grouping by a different value than the Claim ID that the records DO have in common.
I tried to Short this problem where i Use Subsummary first sorted with Invoice ID and then another Subsummary sort field with Claim Id Underneath . Thanks for the help.
I don't see how that can work when two of the records do not have an invoice ID as they show N/A in that column. With a subsummary part with "when sorted by invoice ID", sorting on that field first will group all records with InvoicID = N/A under one subsummary part regardless of their Claim Number values.