AnsweredAssumed Answered


Question asked by GoncaloAntunesdeOliveira on Apr 27, 2014
Latest reply on May 2, 2014 by GoncaloAntunesdeOliveira






     I'm trying to create something for moths and it's turning out to be very frustrating:


     I'm building a database that will store a big collection. Instead of stuff being catalogued by it's nature (CD's, books, videos, etc.), it has to be according to some rules:

     1. Have to atribute categories according to: Fonds, Subfonds, Sections, Subsections, Series, Subseries, Instalation Units, Composed Documents, Simple Documents and Digital Representations.


     12 digital representations will form a Simple Document (12 songs will form a CD).

     A book is a Simple Document.


     A commercial box that has 4 CD's (like a box-set with some band's sigles) will form a Composed Document, as it contains 4 Simple Documents.

     An Encyclopedia can be categorized as a Composed Document because it contains a collections of same-sort books.


     If the guy a shelf with these CD's and some books, then it would be considered an Instalation Unit (combined Simple and Composed Documents)


     Finally, this stuff is a part of the Fond with the guy's name, a Subfond like "Stuff from his company", a Section like (Audio); Subsection (CD's); Series "Rock"; Subseries "Ramones"; Composed Document "Singles Collection"; Simple Document "Each single"


     And last, but not least, although it follows a hierarchical path, it CAN go straight from Fond to Series (not having Sections).




     As far as I can see, if I atribute some kind of serial number that will aggregate each category created and having it sort by that serial, it might give me the possibility to view all this stuff like a TREE or like a Folder/Subfolder system.


     Please help me. This is haunting me for months.


     Although it's in Portuguese, please have a look at the image.


     Thank you all!