8 Replies Latest reply on Aug 13, 2009 10:57 PM by ebanista

    Using SMTP for email

    ebanista

      Title

      Using SMTP for email

      Post

      Is there a limit to the number of emails, with an attachment, that can be sent in a single script? When I do a test run of 2 or 3 recipients it works fine. But when I then try to send a run of 50 or 60, no one seems to get the mail. Am I doing something wrong?

       

      Thanks,

       

      Glenn

        • 1. Re: Using SMTP for email
          casey777
             There is no limit to the number of emails you can send using a single script. I trust you are using a loop so sending 2 should work the same as sending 4 or 40. You may want to send yourself a cc of each to see what is going on, or post the script here for us to look at. It is really difficult to help you without seeing at least part of the script in question.
          • 2. Re: Using SMTP for email
            philmodjunk
               You may also want to use Get ( LastError ) immediately after each send mail step so that you can capture any error codes that might be returned.
            • 3. Re: Using SMTP for email
              ebanista
                

              Sorry, TECman, I wasn't clear.

               

              I'm using the "Send Mail" script with the "Send via: SMTP Server" option and then the "Create: Multiple emails" option to send one email to every record in the found set.

               

              Glenn

              • 4. Re: Using SMTP for email
                ebanista
                  

                There doesn't appear to be an "error" as such in FMP. It's just that the recipients don't seem to be "getting the message."

                 

                It's kind of embarrassing to keep sending test emails to various group sizes :-)

                 

                Glenn

                • 5. Re: Using SMTP for email
                  casey777
                    

                  Seems if it works for a smaller found set it should work for a larger set. One remote possibility is that the emails are getting caught by spam filters or mail servers which block unknown senders/servers. 

                   

                  Personally and depending on what you are doing, I would make use of the full name in your database, considering you have full names, and personalize each email including a confirmation or unsubscribe option at the bottom containing the email address to which the email was sent.  

                   

                  Usually easier to send emails to a found set, but today it is all about communication on a personal basis. 

                   

                  Frank

                   

                   

                  • 6. Re: Using SMTP for email
                    ebanista
                      

                    Thanks, Frank,

                     

                    The emails are fully personalized with recipient's name and pertinent data and do contain appropriate sender info as well. in this case the "found set" is a local group of neighbors, so the "unsubscribe" option isn't used, though that functionality is availble if required. And I agree, it the personalization that's so important nowadays and so easy to accomplish with FileMaker.

                     

                    Glenn

                    • 7. Re: Using SMTP for email
                      davidanders
                        

                      Sometimes the restriction on email receiptiants is due to the limit set by the SMTP server to prevent spam.

                      You can test this by getting a free gmail account and using their SMTP server.

                      Your ISP's FAQs may document this limitation. 

                      David Anders

                      • 8. Re: Using SMTP for email
                        ebanista
                          

                        Thanks David.

                         

                        That was the answer I was expecting and simultaneously hoping I wouldn't get. I'll check into it. :-(

                         

                        Glenn