Thank you for your post.
Our Development and Testing departments are already aware of this discrepancy.
I noticed you have subsequently found and posted to the description and explanation at:
I have attached your comments to the original report.
Yes, thanks, TSGal… I found that brilliant workaround posted by Phil in that other thread. I have now implemented that workaround from Phil in my solution, so please ask the Development & Testing departments to NOT change the behavior of that workaround, because it works! ;)