On startup FMS binds to only a single NIC so all traffic will be thru that connection.
Can you bind the two NIC's into a single entity?
This may depend on your network and setup. I think one of the recommendations was to look at Network usage. In windows you can do this with Performance Monitor and look at the network usage. If it is high on the graph then adding a high performance nic to the system may be helpful.
I haven't looked at this in a long time, but I was under the impression that there were dual Nics available that let you assign both connections to the same address. You will have to do some research and see if this exists and if it is compatible with your server. I'm fairly sure that you can't do this kind is setup just by adding a second standard Nic.
Thanks for your response, ch0c0halic.
Not to doubt you, but it would appear from my testing that I can connect to my FM Server on two IP addresses/NICs simultaneously and open a different database via each connection.
Here are my actual network file path's for each:
And here is the output of netstat -an from my mac:
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state)
tcp4 0 0 192.168.1.169.59021 192.168.1.156.5003 ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 0 192.168.1.169.59014 192.168.1.157.5003 ESTABLISHED
I should have mentioned my FM Server is a Mac OS X Server v 10.6.
Am I just being fooled by what I'm seeing via netstat and the fmnet: statement which appear to work??
Thanks for your response.
I am aware of the capability of Windows Server to bind two NICs to one address. However, I am on a Mac Server, which I should've mentioned. I am not aware of a way to do this on a Mac (OS X Server v10.6).
However, I seem to be having some success in my testing of this hypothesis. See my response to ch0c0halic for details.
We have about 30 concurrent users on a Mac network, and performance was a little sluggish
So, our IT guy spent time adding dual NICs, with no performance gain
There are so many other limiting factors, the "bottleneck" will most likely be elsewhere
If you have the time, try it both ways and see for yourself
> If I set up a FileMaker Server box with dual NICs, separate IP addresses and DNS entries that point both IP addresses to the name of the FileMaker Server should I expect a performance increase with respect to network access and through put?
What model server are you running?
On the Mac Server run Activity monitor and watch the network stats. This should let you know if the Network is your bottleneck. Other possibilities include , Unstored calculations ( can be hugh ), slow/full disk system.
Sorry I didn't address this issue originally. I agree with "gdurniak". I'd check the network usage. My guess is with Gigabyte Ethernet you are not using all the bandwidth of even a single NIC. If you were on a WAN then Latency might be an issue. But if its all LAN then it shouldn't be a problem.
Hardware performance is usually limited by the Hard drive. Using an SSD would be my first suggestion.
Then more RAM.
Then a Faster/More Processor(s)
Then make sure you are using certified Gigabyte Ethernet Cabling
Check the Routers and Hubs for low Signal-to-noise ratios or bad connections
All of this assumes the problem is hardware and not database design. There are so many design related performance issues that it is possible for the fastest system in the world to still perform slowly. BTW conversion from FMP11 to 12 is not an automatic speed increase. The new design surface has made some layout designs slower.