So when performance in FileMaker 12 was better, it's because the new version is faster; but when the experienced performance was worse than FileMaker 11, it's because of the wi-fi connection? That's plausible, but not very convincing. You should test FMS11 vs. FMS12 on the same host machine using the same network connection. Can you describe exactly what each benchmark operation did and your measurements for how long each took in each version of FileMaker? Can you post the database files you used for benchmarking so the rest of us can replicate your experiment in other settings?
No I can't
My preliminar test let me think what I wrote.
Then when I really upgraded i've had a relevant increment of speed in any operation...
The sense of this post is to testimoniate a positive experience; we use to share only the bad experiences
Sharing anecdotes is helpful, but evidence would make us more confident.
Performance is mostly case by case, since specific features were reported to be "slower" ( and some faster )
> After the release of FM12 many Threads have been written complaining the lower speed of v12 against v11.
It's no longer so!